Recent Quotes
Test Quote 1 (IT)Alluminio 2007 – 10 Parti – 125,15 EURTest Quote 1 (DE)Aluminium 2007 – 10 Pièces – 125,15 EURTest Quote 1 (EN)Aluminium 2007 – 10 Parts – 125.15 EURTest Quote 1 (FR)Aluminium 2007 – 10 Teile – 125,15 EUR

MJF vs SLS: 3D printing technologies compared

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) and Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) are the two most ubiquitous 3D printing technologies for polymers and elastomers. While they share some similarities, there are some differences between these technologies that make each one more suitable than the other in different situations.

Technologies description


In this technology, a printer, using cross-sections of a 3D CAD model as a guide, deposits a layer of material powder on a building platform. A high-power CO2 laser sinters this layer according to the required shape from the CAD model. Another layer of material is deposited on the previous layer and sintered again. This process of layering and sintering is repeated until the part is formed.

SLS 3D Printing


MJF (Multi Jet Fusion), also known as HP MJF, is similar to SLS. However, in MJF, after each layer of powder is deposited and heated to a near sintering temperature, an inkjet array jets a liquid fusing agent on the layer. This fusing agent promotes the absorption of infrared rays. A detailing agent is also deposited along the exterior edges of the part. An infrared source then sinters everything together before a fresh layer of powder is deposited on the previous layer. These processes are repeated until the part is created.

HP Multi Jet Fusion (source:

Similarities between SLS and HP MJF

The major similarities between the technologies are:

  • They are both powder fusion technologies involving the use of powdered material
  • They both require a heat source for sintering
  • Neither of them requires object support during printing, thus allowing the construction of complex geometries.
  • They both work by layering
  • They work mainly with thermoplastics and elastomers

Differences between  SLS and HP MJF


SLS has been around for a much longer period, having been originally patented in 1997. This technology has gone through several advancements that enable it to cater for several materials such as PA 11, PA 12, PA 12 Glass-filled, PEBA 2301 3D, Alumide, TPU, etc. This offers the flexibility of choice for the SLS process.

MJF, on the other hand, is relatively new as it was made commercially available as recently as 2017. Therefore, this technology can work with only a few materials such as PA 12, PA 11, and TPU.

Dimensional accuracy and feature resolution

Both technologies offer high dimensional accuracy. Pitting MJF vs SLS however, MJF parts have a slightly finer feature resolution than SLS. One of the reasons for this is the detailing agent used in MJF which increases the precision of created parts. However, as both technologies are susceptible to warping, flat large surfaces should be avoided for printing.

Processing time

SLS and MJF have roughly the same print time for the production of one part. However, for the time taken for the entire process including setting up the machine, printing, and cooling, MJF requires a shorter time. This is because MJF printers have a removable build platform that allows for the printed part to be cooled outside of the machine. Also, for the production of many parts, MJF is faster as this technology can print dozens of parts at the same time.

Concerning recyclability, 80% of the powder recovered from MJF printed parts is recyclable, compared to SLS with 30 – 50% recyclability.


The surface finish of parts from both technologies are grainy, with MJF parts having a slightly smoother finish. SLS parts are usually white or grey and can be dyed in a wide variety of colours. The fusing agent used in MJF is black to enhance the absorption of infrared rays. Because of this black colour, MJF parts usually have a greyish appearance and are usually dyed black.

Read more on the surface finish of 3D printed parts in our article.

Properties of manufactured parts

MJF and SLS parts have slightly varying mechanical and physical properties. The properties of SLS vs MJF are given in the table below.

PropertyMJF SLS 
Tensile strength (Mpa)1700 (X,Y) 1800(Z)1650 (X,Y) 1650 (Z) 
Tensile Modulus (Mpa)48 (X,Y) 48 (Z)48 (X,Y) 42(Z)
Strain at break (%)20 (X,Y) 15 (Z)18 (X,Y) 24(Z)
Melting point (°C) 187176

Part size

SLS printing is able to produce larger parts (up to 600 x 350 x 560 mm) than MJF printing (up to 380 x 284 x 380 mm). On the hand, MJF can print features as small as 0.5 mm, while SLS can print a minimum feature size of 0.8 mm.


MJF single parts cost about 30% less to print than their SLS counterparts. The difference increases as parts volume increases. This is because of the HP MJF printer’s ability to print several parts simultaneously. 

Head over to our instant quoting platform to upload your models for SLS or MJF 3D printing, and compare prices in a few seconds seconds.

Summary on choosing the right technology

Property SLSMJF
MaterialsCan print several materials including PA 11, PA 12, PA 12 Glass-filled, TPU, PEBA 2301 3D, and AlumideCan currently print only PA 11, PA 12, PA 12 Glass-filled, and TPU
Dimensional accuracyProduces parts with very high dimensional accuraciesProduces parts with slightly higher dimensional accuracies than SLS. This is due to the detailing agent used in the MJF process.
Processing timeTakes longer to produce parts than MJF, especially for larger quantitiesTakes a shorter time than SLS to produce parts. This is due to the presence of a removable build platform in MJF printers that allow parts to cool outside of the printer. These printers can also print many parts simultaneously
FinishingParts produced have a grainy surface finishParts produced also have a grainy surface finish but slightly smoother than their SLS counterparts
Part sizeCan produce parts as large as 600 x 350 x 560 mm, and features as small as 0.8 mmCan produce parts as large as 380 x 284 x 380 mm, and  as small as 0.5 mm
CostSLS on average cost 30% more than MJF. This difference increases as the number of parts produced increases.

Xometry Europe offers both of these technologies for many materials. Visit our website to get an instate quote for your project using our instant quoting platform, or contact us for more information!

Posted in 3D Printing